Re: [Bug-readline] readline not compiling on MinGW because of missing #ifdefs for SIGHUP and SIGQUIT

[Chet Ramey]

On 8/25/16 3:55 PM, Simon Sobisch wrote:
> I'd rather like to see a MinGW build for the GnuCOBOL 2.0 release than a
> VisualStudio build just "because it compiles directly and the MinGW
> build does not". And this is exactly what is happening with the people
> testing our release candidate.
> 
> readline doesn't compile because of the SIGNALs SIGHUP and SIGQUIT that
> are missing in windows (and therefore in the mingw headers, too).
> 
> Looking at Readline 6.3 there are at least signals.c (missing #ifdef
> SIGHUP, already has #ifdef SIGQUIT) and input.c (missing both) that
> needs a fix.
> 
> Can you please fix both (and grep for other files possibly needing a
> fix) and include them in the "offical" readline-master.tar.gz?

I'll fix SIGHUP and SIGQUIT for readline-7.0.  Are there any other common
Unix signals that MinGW doesn't provide?

Chet

-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
                 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    address@hidden    http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature