bug-readline
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-readline] [PATCH] Enable visibility annotations


From: Mike Frysinger
Subject: Re: [Bug-readline] [PATCH] Enable visibility annotations
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:02:54 -0400

On 14 Apr 2016 16:14, Yury Gribov wrote:
> On 04/14/2016 04:10 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 14 Apr 2016 15:28, Yury Gribov wrote:
> >> On 04/14/2016 01:47 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> >>> On 04/14/2016 07:45 AM, Yury Gribov wrote:
> >>>> These two patches add visibility annotations to readline's public
> >>>> functions and also enable -fvisibility=hidden on platforms where it's
> >>>> available.
> >>>>
> >>>> This results in 9% size decrease (279K -> 254K) and 45% export symbols
> >>>> reduction (655 -> 398) for libreadline on x86_64.
> >>>>
> >>>> The autoconf hunk is similar to one that I've recently submitted to
> >>>> X.org's libICE, hope there's no licensing problem about this.
> >>>>
> >>>> Is this ok for trunk?
> >>>
> >>> FYI, this is probably doing to break (at least) gdb against system
> >>> readline.  gdb relies on accessing a few private readline symbols...  :-/
> >>>
> >>> E.g.:
> >>>
> >>> tui/tui-io.c:437:  extern int _rl_echoing_p;
> >>> completer.c:1677:  extern int _rl_complete_mark_directories;
> >>> completer.c:1770:extern int _rl_completion_prefix_display_length;
> >>> completer.c:1771:extern int _rl_print_completions_horizontally;
> >>>
> >>> Unless/until someone fixes these and adds the missing public APIs
> >>> to readline, I think distros will need to either back off this
> >>> patch, or build gdb against a static readline, which they'd rather
> >>> not (at least Fedora doesn't want that).
> >>>
> >>> We may need a configure option as workaround, or perhaps export
> >>> the _rl_foo symbols as well...
> >>
> >> Thanks, this sounds as a general problem with visibility enabling.  Is
> >> there some (relatively straightforward) way to find all used symbols?
> >> I'm afraid there'll be more than just _rl_*...
> >
> > just build gdb w/system readline enabled and see if it works :)
> 
> GDB - yes, sure but I'm more worried about other packages that silently 
> use non-public readline symbols...

maybe Chet has an opinion, but i think it's good to weed those out
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]