[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rcs-5.9.4: t810 test failed
From: |
Xose Vazquez Perez |
Subject: |
Re: rcs-5.9.4: t810 test failed |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Nov 2017 16:53:24 +0100 |
On 10/31/2017 11:43 AM, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
> I have just pushed ephemeral (SUBJECT TO EVENTUAL DELETION)
> branch ‘q-ns’ to savannah that adds support for nanosecond
> resolution for the file mtime (where possible). I do this now
> because i have some urgent IRL duties to attend to, and won't be
> able to work on RCS for the next week or so. In the meantime,
> i hope people can find a moment to take a critical look at the
> proposed changes and post their (constructive) critique.
I did clone q-ns branch, and t810 fails sporadically.
Sometimes it pass, sometimes it fails.
t810 test failed:
$ cat out
t810.d/x,v --> t810.d/x
revision 4.21 (locked)
done
t810.d/x,v <-- t810.d/x
new revision: 4.22; previous revision: 4.21
done
PROBLEM: t810.d/x newer than t810.d/x,v
$ stat x*
File: x
Size: 29 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 regular file
Device: 801h/2049d Inode: 1592775 Links: 1
Access: (0600/-rw-------) Uid: ( 1000/ xose) Gid: ( 1000/ xose)
Access: 2017-11-03 16:44:04.729991025 +0100
Modify: 2017-11-03 16:44:04.730991037 +0100
Change: 2017-11-03 16:44:04.730991037 +0100
Birth: -
File: x,v
Size: 439 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 regular file
Device: 801h/2049d Inode: 1592773 Links: 1
Access: (0400/-r--------) Uid: ( 1000/ xose) Gid: ( 1000/ xose)
Access: 2017-11-03 16:44:04.000000000 +0100
Modify: 2017-11-03 16:44:04.729991025 +0100
Change: 2017-11-03 16:44:04.738991130 +0100
Birth: -
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: rcs-5.9.4: t810 test failed,
Xose Vazquez Perez <=