[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#16338: [PATCH 2/2] Fix filesystem detection on non 512 byte sectors
From: |
Brian C. Lane |
Subject: |
bug#16338: [PATCH 2/2] Fix filesystem detection on non 512 byte sectors |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Mar 2014 07:30:23 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 09:51:18PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
> On 03/03/2014 07:36 PM, Phillip Susi wrote:
> > On 03/03/2014 02:45 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> >> Do our tests already cover all of these filesystems?
> >
> > I think so but now that I look at this again, it looks like I
> > forgot to fix the tests. Currently they skip on !512 byte sector
> > size. I'll fix that.
>
> So the best looking test to do this appears to be t1700-probe-fs. The
> problem is that it uses a loop file instead of a real device, and so
> does not really simulate !512 byte sectors. Also when I tried adding
> jfs, ntfs, and hfs, I found that hfs does not support -V ( version )
> to test if it is supported, and mkfs.ntfs exits with an error status
> when run with -V, and mkfs.jfs tries to do an interactive prompt to
> really use a file instead of a device, and redirecting stdin to
> /dev/null causes it to crash with a SIGABRT. I suppose for the time
> being, this just may just have to be an untested feature.
>
> I did update the patch for the recent addition of btrfs support, and
> so will follow up this email with that.
>
Sounds good for now.
--
Brian C. Lane | Anaconda Team | IRC: bcl #anaconda | Port Orchard, WA (PST8PDT)