[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sanity check
From: |
Andrew Clausen |
Subject: |
Re: sanity check |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Nov 2001 11:12:37 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.17i |
Hi Don,
Your entire email came through as one paragraph... it would be easier
if it was broken up a bit ;)
On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 11:04:55AM -0600, Don Mulvey wrote:
> As you know, I have been playing a bit with libparted
1.5.x?
> and trying to run
> through evms partition discovery by making libparted calls. I have a bit
> of code from the discovery piece that I wanted to show you. In the
> following code, a segment manager has been called by the evms engine to
> discover partitions on a disk and create a partition list. The code is
> passed a storage object (type==disk) and is suppose to use the i/o routines
> and geometry info provided by the disk storage object. Ok?
ala _arch_device_new() in libparted/device_linux.c?
That should be your model ;)
> The approach
> is to build a PedDevice with the same info as the disk storage object and
> then continue with the partition discovery process. So, I first get a
> PedDevice from libparted
Huh? _arch_device_new() ped_malloc()'s it's own PedDevice... you
should be doing the same thing, IMHO.
> Currently, I am getting as far as read_table()
> ( in disk_dos.c ) but then failing on partition checks. I think it is due
> to reported geometry and invalid partition allignment.
Hmmm, does it usually complain? (i.e. if you use parted normally)
Is it a warning (which you can be choosing to resolve by ignoring it)?
> However, I have a
> very simple partition scheme, cylinder allingment, etc. and believe I am
> simply not telling parted the correct info ... someplace. The test disk
> (C=827,H=64,S=63) has 3 logical drives in an extended partition.
> Libparted coughs right away ... doesnt like the extended partition record
> in the mbr. The extended starts (0,1,1) and ends (8,63,63). Could
> you take a look and tell me if I am crazy or not? Thanks, Don
>
>
> sprintf(disk_name, "/dev/%s", ld->name); // ld==disk storage object ...
> ld->name == hda, hdb, etc
> disk_pdata->ped_device = ped_device_get(disk_name);
YUCK! Yes, I think this is crazy...
Andrew
- sanity check, Don Mulvey, 2001/11/05
- Re: sanity check,
Andrew Clausen <=