[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: _probe_with_open bug?
From: |
Andrew Clausen |
Subject: |
Re: _probe_with_open bug? |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Jun 2001 09:01:33 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 07:16:58PM -0400, Matt Wilson wrote:
> Currently if we have two filesystems detected with
> ped_file_system_probe and only one of them has an open function, we
> loose and get nothing. In this case we have a NTFS signature and a
> valid linux-swap "filesystem". Wouldn't it be better to let the
> linux-swap filesystem open win?
Yep, I guess... for now.
In the long term, I'll make probe() return a PedGeometry, and compare
it against what's in the partition table entry, or whatever.
Much better heuristic, I suspect. Also useful for gpart-like
functionality. I'm a bit worried about people doing mkfs on
an existing partition though... you get identical PedGeometry's...
so I guess you still need to resort to this open_with_probe thing :/
Andrew Clausen
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: _probe_with_open bug?,
Andrew Clausen <=