[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ANN: ncurses-6.2-20211016
From: |
Milan P . Stanić |
Subject: |
Re: ANN: ncurses-6.2-20211016 |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Oct 2021 18:48:25 +0200 |
On Mon, 2021-10-25 at 19:34, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 11:39:23PM +0200, Milan P. Stanić wrote:
> > On Mon, 2021-10-25 at 16:26, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 03:28:38PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > > ...
> > > > hmm - the drawback that I knew of was that it would pick the first
> > > > directory
> > > > scanned (which isn't necessarily the one most often used).
> > > > Standardization
> > > > across pkg-config's always been very poor, so I've machines with all of
> > > > the
> > > > choices being used by one package or another.
> > > >
> > > > To recap, the current issue was begun by a report that the existing
> > > > (Debian-biased) predefined list of directories wasn't suitable.
> > > >
> > > > The manual page mentions
> > > >
> > > > --variable=VARIABLENAME
> > > > This returns the value of a variable defined in a
> > > > package's .pc
> > > > file. Most packages define the variable "prefix", for
> > > > example,
> > > > so you can say:
> > > > $ pkg-config --variable=prefix glib-2.0
> > > > /usr/
> > > >
> > > > and I overlooked its usefulness for the task (because the manual page
> > > > doesn't
> > > > point out the relationship between "pc_path", PKG_CONFIG_PATH and
> > > > PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR (actually reading the source code is needed to see the
> > > > distinction between the latter two):
> > > >
> > > > pc_path
> > > > The default search path used by pkg-config when
> > > > searching for
> > > > .pc files. This can be used in a query for the pkg-config
> > > > module
> > > > itself itself:
> > > > $ pkg-config --variable pc_path pkg-config
> > > >
> > > > Using "pkg-config --variable=pc_path" gives me this:
> > > >
> > > > /usr/local/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig:/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/local/share/pkgconfig:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig:/usr/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/share/pkgconfig
> > > >
> > > > which needs some work to make it usable when developing a package.
> > > >
> > > > (I did read about "pkgconf" while working on the macro -- because I
> > > > tested it
> > > > with the BSDs which generally don't use pkg-config -- and the point was
> > > > made in _its_ documentation that one should not actually count on it
> > > > being
> > > > compatible in fine details).
> > > >
> > > > fwiw, I test with machines older than 15 years as well...
> > >
> > > for instance, this doesn't work on my Solaris10 machine (0.15.0),
> > > so my configure script will have to check for availability of the feature.
> > >
> > > Checking for when this feature was available in this form,
> > > pkg-config's git log says it was added here:
> > >
> > > commit e170895bc6241e933c6c6e85dc800fef5ed44615
> > >
> > > Author: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no>
> > >
> > > Date: Mon Mar 30 21:17:43 2009 +0200
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2009-03-30 Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > * pkg.c (add_virtual_pkgconfig_package): Add pc_path as a
> > > variable
> > > which you can use to get at the compiled-in
> > > PKG_CONFIG_PC_PATH.
> > >
> > > which (for the upstream) makes it a little over 12 years.
> > > For real use, I'd have to subtract a couple of years.
> > >
> > > For pkgconf, it's a different story:
> > >
> > > commit 7d89f659ffa45d381c3c4ee03c55f74635042829
> > >
> > > Author: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
> > >
> > > Date: Sun Jan 22 10:44:09 2017 +0100
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Fix regression introduced in 7b39c38
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > now pkgconf --variable=pc_path pkg-config works
> > >
> > > The feature itself was added here (9 years ago):
> > >
> > > commit 111046f100a1a63b125494406351ce72a1a486bf
> > >
> > > Author: Ariadne Conill <ariadne@dereferenced.org>
> > >
> > > Date: Sun Jul 22 23:16:39 2012 -0500
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > pkg: add support for $(pc_path) variable for extracting
> > > PKG_DEFAULT_PATH
> > >
> > > But this isn't the pkgconf bug reporting list; further discussion
> > > of that aspect is off-topic.
> >
> > Thomas, I understand this and I also don't like to discuss what is
> > happened years ago and why.
>
> I wrote that so I'd have the background established.
>
> > I only asked if you have fix for installing .pc files in
> > $libdir/usr/lib/pkgconfig instead of root install dir.
>
> I'm working to incorporate the additional information,
> expecting to complete the changes (and test-builds) tomorrow.
Thomas, with ncurses-6.3-20211026 release it builds and works fine on
Alpine linux.
Thank you for help.
Kind regards
- Re: ANN: ncurses-6.2-20211016, (continued)
- Re: ANN: ncurses-6.2-20211016, Thomas Dickey, 2021/10/24
- Re: ANN: ncurses-6.2-20211016, Milan P . Stanić, 2021/10/24
- Re: ANN: ncurses-6.2-20211016, Thomas Dickey, 2021/10/24
- Re: ANN: ncurses-6.2-20211016, Milan P . Stanić, 2021/10/24
- Re: ANN: ncurses-6.2-20211016, Thomas Dickey, 2021/10/24
- Re: ANN: ncurses-6.2-20211016, Milan P . Stanić, 2021/10/25
- Re: ANN: ncurses-6.2-20211016, Thomas Dickey, 2021/10/25
- Re: ANN: ncurses-6.2-20211016, Thomas Dickey, 2021/10/25
- Re: ANN: ncurses-6.2-20211016, Milan P . Stanić, 2021/10/25
- Re: ANN: ncurses-6.2-20211016, Thomas Dickey, 2021/10/25
- Re: ANN: ncurses-6.2-20211016,
Milan P . Stanić <=
- Re: ANN: ncurses-6.2-20211016, Thomas Dickey, 2021/10/28
- Re: ANN: ncurses-6.2-20211016, Thomas Dickey, 2021/10/24