Re: problem with new_item()

[pcazallas]

Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> 
> pcazallas wrote:
>> But after filling the whole ITEM** array, when I print the value of each
>> item from the first, all of them have stored the last one given to
>> new_item()...
> 
> Item's don't have their own buffers, they just remember the pointer
> passed to new_item() (see the man page).  It looks as if you used the
> same buffer for all items.
> 
> You have to allocate a separate string buffer for each item.
> 
> 
> HTH
> Clemens
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-ncurses mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-ncurses
> 
> 

Thanks, it's working after implementing your tip =)

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/problem-with-new_item%28%29-tp28679696p28682131.html
Sent from the Gnu - Ncurses mailing list archive at Nabble.com.