Re: problem with new_item()

[Clemens Ladisch]

pcazallas wrote:
> But after filling the whole ITEM** array, when I print the value of each
> item from the first, all of them have stored the last one given to
> new_item()...

Item's don't have their own buffers, they just remember the pointer
passed to new_item() (see the man page).  It looks as if you used the
same buffer for all items.

You have to allocate a separate string buffer for each item.


HTH
Clemens