[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Could --disable-leaks be made a runtime switch?
|
From: |
Avery Pennarun |
|
Subject: |
Re: Could --disable-leaks be made a runtime switch? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:57:21 -0500 |
On 12/02/2008, Thomas Dickey <address@hidden> wrote:
> I recall seeing SuSE's package for ncurses had turned on the feature -
> a while back.
Perhaps it should be the default nowadays? The tiny performance
increase from not cleaning up the objects should be irrelevant on
modern machines, while the valgrind improvement will save people time.
Avery
- Could --disable-leaks be made a runtime switch?, Steve Litt, 2008/02/11
- Re: Could --disable-leaks be made a runtime switch?, Avery Pennarun, 2008/02/12
- Re: Could --disable-leaks be made a runtime switch?, Thomas Dickey, 2008/02/12
- Re: Could --disable-leaks be made a runtime switch?, Avery Pennarun, 2008/02/12
- Re: Could --disable-leaks be made a runtime switch?, Thomas Dickey, 2008/02/12
- Re: Could --disable-leaks be made a runtime switch?,
Avery Pennarun <=
- Re: Could --disable-leaks be made a runtime switch?, Thomas Dickey, 2008/02/12
- Re: Could --disable-leaks be made a runtime switch?, Avery Pennarun, 2008/02/12
- Re: Could --disable-leaks be made a runtime switch?, Stephan Beal, 2008/02/12
- Re: Could --disable-leaks be made a runtime switch?, Steve Litt, 2008/02/12