[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mvwprintw
From: |
Bob Rossi |
Subject: |
Re: mvwprintw |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Apr 2006 14:47:54 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
> hmm - go back to my last explanation. The screen is being corrupted
> because either ncurses or some other code is writing bad data. If it is
> ncurses, you should be able to see it by tracing the low-level function
> PutAttrChar(), which is actually doing the output to the screen. The
> trace you sent should have showed PutAttrChar(), but did not.
>
> I'd see why it did not, and fix that (perhaps I misread the trace-level).
> Then see if PutAttrChar() is getting bad data, or making it bad - there's
> one call to PUTC() in tty_update.c which is doing the work.
OK, I have verified that the corruption for me does not happen in the
function PutAttrChar.
Basically, I started CGDB. Attached to it with GDB and did
'call trace (8191)'. Then I typed 'a', in the CGDB window. Then I called
'call trace (0)' in GDB. When I looked at the trace file there was
PutAttrChar({'a' = 0141}) at (59, 7)
However, I start CGDB and type 'b main.c:7' and then type the back
arrow 5 times. Then I attach with GDB and do 'call trace (8191)'. Then in
the CGDB window I type the forward arrow twice, the corruption
shows up. In the GDB I type 'call trace (0)'. Then in the CGDB window I
quit. There is not a single instance of PutAttrChar.
I've attached the trace file that has the corruption. Does anything stick
out with this new info?
Thanks for all your help! I'll continue to look if something in my
program is writing to stdout. However, that task could prove difficult
short of recompiling the C library and setting a breakpoint on 'write'.
Thanks,
Bob Rossi
trace
Description: Text document
- Re: mvwprintw, (continued)
- Re: mvwprintw, Thomas Dickey, 2006/04/03
- Re: mvwprintw, Bob Rossi, 2006/04/03
- Re: mvwprintw, Thomas Dickey, 2006/04/03
- Re: mvwprintw, Bob Rossi, 2006/04/03
- Re: mvwprintw, Bob Rossi, 2006/04/03
- Re: mvwprintw, Thomas Dickey, 2006/04/03
- Re: mvwprintw, Bob Rossi, 2006/04/03
- Re: mvwprintw, Thomas Dickey, 2006/04/03
- Re: mvwprintw, Bob Rossi, 2006/04/03
- Re: mvwprintw, Thomas Dickey, 2006/04/04
Re: mvwprintw,
Bob Rossi <=