[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: portability of ncurses
|
From: |
William McBrine |
|
Subject: |
Re: portability of ncurses |
|
Date: |
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:31:38 -0500 (EST) |
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Rajat Das wrote:
I was reading the Linux Standard Base book and they say that one should
use curses.h instead of ncurses.h for portability reasons.
That just means the name in the #include statement. ncurses _is_ the
standard curses in Linux, so they're the same. On my distro, for example,
ncurses.h is a symlink to curses.h.
--
William McBrine <address@hidden>