[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Building ncurses with libtool (32/64 bit)
From: |
Albert Chin |
Subject: |
Re: Building ncurses with libtool (32/64 bit) |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Jan 2004 12:39:34 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 12:03:22AM +1000, Kevin Ryde wrote:
> Thomas Dickey <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > perhaps. But there's no AC_REQUIRE connecting any of the pieces.
> > If there were an AC_REQUIRE, the expected behavior would be to
> > force AC_PROG_LIBTOOL to expand before the macro. Since there is
> > none, it should expand within.
>
> If we're talking about libtool 1.5, then notice the first thing
> AC_PROG_LIBTOOL does is an AC_REQUIRE of _AC_PROG_LIBTOOL. :-(
So the fac that AC_PROG_LIBTOOL AC_REQUIRE's something is the fault
(i.e. a bug in AC_REQUIRE)?
--
albert chin (address@hidden)
- Re: Building ncurses with libtool (32/64 bit), (continued)
- Re: Building ncurses with libtool (32/64 bit), Thomas Dickey, 2004/01/15
- Re: Building ncurses with libtool (32/64 bit), Albert Chin, 2004/01/15
- Re: Building ncurses with libtool (32/64 bit), Thomas Dickey, 2004/01/16
- Re: Building ncurses with libtool (32/64 bit), Albert Chin, 2004/01/16
- Re: Building ncurses with libtool (32/64 bit), Thomas Dickey, 2004/01/16
- Re: Building ncurses with libtool (32/64 bit), Thomas Dickey, 2004/01/16
- Re: Building ncurses with libtool (32/64 bit), Kevin Ryde, 2004/01/16
- Re: Building ncurses with libtool (32/64 bit), Thomas Dickey, 2004/01/16
- Re: Building ncurses with libtool (32/64 bit), Kevin Ryde, 2004/01/17
- Re: Building ncurses with libtool (32/64 bit), Thomas Dickey, 2004/01/17
- Re: Building ncurses with libtool (32/64 bit),
Albert Chin <=
- Re: Building ncurses with libtool (32/64 bit), Thomas Dickey, 2004/01/17
- Re: Building ncurses with libtool (32/64 bit), Thomas Dickey, 2004/01/15