[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: wide vs. complex characters

From: Robert Brady
Subject: Re: wide vs. complex characters
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 03:38:55 +0100 (BST)

On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, Neil Zanella wrote:

> You must be right. I was wondering how a 16-bit code with 2^16 =
> 65536 would be enough to accomodate all those symbols. By the way,
> I tried browsing the Unicode symbols on Solaris 5.7 but I did
> not see any characters displayed on my screen other than the
> ASCII ones. Do you know of a way to browse Unicode symbols on
> some platform?

Try http://charts.unicode.org/

Also, I'd suggest looking at <http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/unicode.html>

> Has unicode been fully implemented anywhere yet?

Depending on what you mean, the answer varies between "yes, certainly",
and "no, of course not!"


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]