[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse
From: |
Paul Smith |
Subject: |
Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse |
Date: |
Sun, 05 May 2013 02:19:53 -0400 |
On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 00:44 +0200, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> The test 'features/output-sync' now fails for me:
>
> Test timed out after 6 seconds
> Error running /storage/home/stefano/src/gnu/make/tests/../make \
> (expected 0; got 14): /storage/home/stefano/src/gnu/make/tests/../make \
> -f work/features/output-sync.mk.1 -j --output-sync=target
> Caught signal 14!
> FAILED (4/6 passed)
>
> Can you reproduce the failure? If not, let me know which information you
> need to debug this, and I'll try to provide them.
It didn't fail for me. However, it's possible that the 6 second timeout
is just a little too short for reliability.
Look at line 178 in the test/scripts/features/output-sync file. It will
look like this:
#MAKE#[1]: Leaving directory '#PWD#/bar'\n", 0, 6);
The "6" at the end is the timeout. Try changing that to 10 just to see
if it helps. If not then it's a real problem. I'll need details about
your system. Also please send the contents of the work subdirectory
after the failure.
- Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option, (continued)
- Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option, Paul Smith, 2013/05/03
- Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/03
- possible solution for -Otarget recurse (was: Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option), Paul Smith, 2013/05/03
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse (was: Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option), Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/03
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse (was: Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option), Paul Smith, 2013/05/03
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse (was: Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option), Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/03
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse (was: Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option), Paul Smith, 2013/05/03
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse (was: Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option), Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/04
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse (was: Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option), Paul Smith, 2013/05/04
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/05/04
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse,
Paul Smith <=
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/05/05
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse, Paul Smith, 2013/05/05
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/05/05
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse, David Boyce, 2013/05/05
- Message not available
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse (was: Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option), Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/05
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse (was: Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option), Paul Smith, 2013/05/05
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse (was: Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option), Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/05
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse (was: Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option), Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/06
- Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/01