Re: [PATCH] Options: `--dry-run' should prevent `--touch' from touching

[Michael Witten]

On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 16:59, Michael Witten <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 17:14, Paul Smith <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 18:49 -0500, Michael Witten wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 00:00, Paul Smith <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> > On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 03:52 -0500, Michael Witten wrote:
>>> >> > Thus, it makes most sense for `--dry-run' (`-n') to mask `--touch' 
>>> >> > (`-t')
>>> >> > rather than the other way around (which is the current, buggy, 
>>> >> > unexpected,
>>> >> > possibly ruinous behavior).
>>> >
>>> > This patch seems correct to me.
>>>
>>> Is this discussions finished then?
>>
>> Yes, I will make this fix.
>
> Are you still planning to commit my patch?
>
>  Message-ID: <address@hidden>
>  http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-make/2011-03/msg00000.html

Hello?