Re: [PATCH] Options: `--dry-run' should prevent `--touch' from touching

[Michael Witten]

On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 17:14, Paul Smith <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 18:49 -0500, Michael Witten wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 00:00, Paul Smith <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 03:52 -0500, Michael Witten wrote:
>> >> > Thus, it makes most sense for `--dry-run' (`-n') to mask `--touch' 
>> >> > (`-t')
>> >> > rather than the other way around (which is the current, buggy, 
>> >> > unexpected,
>> >> > possibly ruinous behavior).
>> >
>> > This patch seems correct to me.
>>
>> Is this discussions finished then?
>
> Yes, I will make this fix.

Are you still planning to commit my patch?

  Message-ID: <address@hidden>
  http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-make/2011-03/msg00000.html