Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

bug-make (thread)

[Date Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Tue Apr 26 2011 12:06:33 -0400 Threads in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• makefile target "all:" not built automatically, Jon Grant, 2011/04/26
  • Re: makefile target "all:" not built automatically, Paul Smith, 2011/04/26
    • Re: makefile target "all:" not built automatically, Jon Grant, 2011/04/26
      • Re: makefile target "all:" not built automatically, Edward Welbourne, 2011/04/26
• [bug #33138] .PARLLELSYNC enhancement with patch, David Boyce, 2011/04/21
  • [bug #33138] .PARLLELSYNC enhancement with patch, David Boyce, 2011/04/22
• [bug #33134] spurious error when stdout is already closed, David Boyce, 2011/04/20
  • Re: [bug #33134] spurious error when stdout is already closed, Philip Guenther, 2011/04/20
    • Re: [bug #33134] spurious error when stdout is already closed, David Boyce, 2011/04/20
      • Re: [bug #33134] spurious error when stdout is already closed, Philip Guenther, 2011/04/21
      • Re: [bug #33134] spurious error when stdout is already closed, David Boyce, 2011/04/21
      • RE: [bug #33134] spurious error when stdout is already closed, Martin Dorey, 2011/04/21
      • Re: [bug #33134] spurious error when stdout is already closed, Philip Guenther, 2011/04/21
      • Re: [bug #33134] spurious error when stdout is already closed, David Boyce, 2011/04/21
      • Re: [bug #33134] spurious error when stdout is already closed, Philip Guenther, 2011/04/21
      • Re: [bug #33134] spurious error when stdout is already closed, David Boyce, 2011/04/21
  • [bug #33134] spurious error when stdout is already closed, David Boyce, 2011/04/21
    • [bug #33134] spurious error when stdout is already closed, David Boyce, 2011/04/21
• [bug #33129] MAKEOVERRIDES reset after a recursive 'make restart', anonymous, 2011/04/19
• [bug #33125] make fails building android build environment due to memory corruption, Matthias Hopf, 2011/04/19
  • [bug #33125] make fails building android build environment due to memory corruption, Matthias Hopf, 2011/04/19
    • [bug #33125] make fails building android build environment due to memory corruption, Matthias Hopf, 2011/04/19
• Re: Why basename in make is defined differently from basename from coreutils?, Paul Smith, 2011/04/17
• bug report acknowledgments should be the default!, jidanni, 2011/04/13
  • Re: bug report acknowledgments should be the default!, Paul Smith, 2011/04/13
  • Re: bug report acknowledgments should be the default!, jidanni, 2011/04/13
    • Re: bug report acknowledgments should be the default!, Paul Smith, 2011/04/13
      • Re: bug report acknowledgments should be the default!, jidanni, 2011/04/13
• patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/12
  • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/14
    • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Paul Smith, 2011/04/14
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/14
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Paul Smith, 2011/04/14
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/14
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/14
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/15
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/15
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/15
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/15
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/19
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/19
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/21
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/14
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Tim Murphy, 2011/04/14
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/14
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/14
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/15
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Tim Murphy, 2011/04/15
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/15
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/04/15
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/15
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/15
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/15
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/15
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Paul Smith, 2011/04/15
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/15
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/15
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Tim Murphy, 2011/04/15
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Paul Smith, 2011/04/15
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/15
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Edward Welbourne, 2011/04/19
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/19
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Howard Chu, 2011/04/15
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Tim Murphy, 2011/04/15
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/14
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Paul Smith, 2011/04/14
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Howard Chu, 2011/04/14
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Paul Smith, 2011/04/14
      • Message not available
      • Fwd: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Tim Murphy, 2011/04/14
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Tim Murphy, 2011/04/14
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Tim Murphy, 2011/04/14
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Paul Smith, 2011/04/14
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Tim Murphy, 2011/04/15
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Paul Smith, 2011/04/15
      • Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, J.T. Conklin, 2011/04/14
• say what will happen when one combines -n and -s, jidanni, 2011/04/12
• Re: [PATCH] Options: `--dry-run' should prevent `--touch' from touching, Michael Witten, 2011/04/11
  • Re: [PATCH] Options: `--dry-run' should prevent `--touch' from touching, Paul Smith, 2011/04/12
• [bug #33034] "Makefile:23: *** mixed implicit and normal rules. Stop." for Linux kernel out of source builds, anonymous, 2011/04/09
  • [bug #33034] "Makefile:23: *** mixed implicit and normal rules. Stop." for Linux kernel out of source builds, Henry Nestler, 2011/04/09
    • [bug #33034] "Makefile:23: *** mixed implicit and normal rules. Stop." for Linux kernel out of source builds, Henry Nestler, 2011/04/09
      • [bug #33034] "Makefile:23: *** mixed implicit and normal rules. Stop." for Linux kernel out of source builds, Paul D. Smith, 2011/04/09
• Re: Detecting parallel builds, Philip Prindeville, 2011/04/09
  • Re: Detecting parallel builds, David Boyce, 2011/04/09
    • Re: Detecting parallel builds, Philip Prindeville, 2011/04/09
      • Re: Detecting parallel builds, David Boyce, 2011/04/09
      • Re: Detecting parallel builds, Philip Prindeville, 2011/04/09
• Possible minor bug in manual?, Federico Sanchez Pinzon, 2011/04/08
  • Re: Possible minor bug in manual?, Paul Smith, 2011/04/17
• substantial 'glob' speedup ..., Michael Meeks, 2011/04/05
  • substantial 'glob' speedup ..., Michael Meeks, 2011/04/06
    • Re: substantial 'glob' speedup ..., Paul Smith, 2011/04/07
      • Re: substantial 'glob' speedup ..., Michael Meeks, 2011/04/08
    • Re: substantial 'glob' speedup ..., Paul Smith, 2011/04/17
      • Re: substantial 'glob' speedup ..., Michael Meeks, 2011/04/19
• [bug #31430] Add support for the BSD "shell assignment" operator (!=), Bruce Lilly, 2011/04/02

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc