[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: make-3.82 testcases fail *sometimes*
From: |
Paul Smith |
Subject: |
Re: make-3.82 testcases fail *sometimes* |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:57:16 -0400 |
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 21:15 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: Paul Smith <address@hidden>
> > CC: address@hidden, address@hidden
> > Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:41:44 -0400
> >
> > > How about introducing a new Make function $(sleep) ? ;-)
> >
> > I don't see how that can work...? We don't want make to sleep, we want
> > the job make invokes to sleep (to emulate a compile that takes some
> > amount of time).
>
> A sub-make could sleep, no?
What I'm saying is that if you have a rule like this:
foo:
$(sleep 0.10) echo hi
The recipe is always expanded by make before it invokes the shell
command, so it would be make that runs the sleep operation, and make
that sleeps, before the shell is even started.
I don't think that would help the issue we're trying to solve (I really
can't see a valid use-case for $(sleep) to be honest).
But, maybe you were thinking of something different?
- make-3.82 testcases fail *sometimes*, Matthias Hopf, 2010/08/31
- Re: make-3.82 testcases fail *sometimes*, Matthias Hopf, 2010/08/31
- Message not available
- Re: make-3.82 testcases fail *sometimes*, Matthias Hopf, 2010/08/31
- Re: make-3.82 testcases fail *sometimes*, Paul Smith, 2010/08/31
- Re: make-3.82 testcases fail *sometimes*, Matthias Hopf, 2010/08/31
- Re: make-3.82 testcases fail *sometimes*, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/31
- Re: make-3.82 testcases fail *sometimes*, Paul Smith, 2010/08/31
- Re: make-3.82 testcases fail *sometimes*, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/31
- Re: make-3.82 testcases fail *sometimes*, Paul Smith, 2010/08/31
- Re: make-3.82 testcases fail *sometimes*, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/31
- Re: make-3.82 testcases fail *sometimes*,
Paul Smith <=
Re: make-3.82 testcases fail *sometimes*, Paul Smith, 2010/08/31