[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug #27809] several win64 fixes
From: |
Ozkan Sezer |
Subject: |
Re: [bug #27809] several win64 fixes |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Jul 2010 14:46:01 +0300 |
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Edward Welbourne <address@hidden> wrote:
[snip]
>> Finally, it seems that some of these changes are meant to avoid variable
>> names conflicting with function names (open, etc.) Is this really a warning
>> that some compilers give?
>
> Even gcc has a flag for it: -Wshadow; I conjecture that the submitter
> is using more aggressive warning flags than you ... I believe -Wshadow
> is not part of what's normally enabled by use of -Wall -Wextra, which
> I tend to prefer (trusting the judgement of the gcc team).
>
> Submitter: what warning flags are you passing to gcc ?
>
The standart warning flags already provided by maintMakefile
which includes -Wshadow
[snip]
--
Ozkan
- [bug #27809] several win64 fixes, (continued)
- Re: [bug #27809] several win64 fixes, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/07/09
- Re: [bug #27809] several win64 fixes, Ozkan Sezer, 2010/07/09
- Re: [bug #27809] several win64 fixes, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/07/09
- Re: [bug #27809] several win64 fixes, Ozkan Sezer, 2010/07/09
- Re: [bug #27809] several win64 fixes, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/07/09
Re: [bug #27809] several win64 fixes, Edward Welbourne, 2010/07/05
- Re: [bug #27809] several win64 fixes,
Ozkan Sezer <=