[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.81 and windows paths
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: 3.81 and windows paths |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:14:46 -0400 |
On 28-Jul-2006, Paul D. Smith wrote:
| Regardless, I still wonder whether my idea of building make for a POSIX
| environment with Cygwin, but setting HAVE_DOS_PATHS explicitly, would
| work.
If this could cause some valid Makefiles to do the wrong thing as cgf
suggests might happen, then can we at least make the behavior
optional, perhaps with a command line option or magic target (maybe
".WINDOWS_FILENAMES:")? That way, people who don't ask for the
special feature won't be bitten by it.
Thanks,
jwe
- Re: 3.81 and windows paths, (continued)
- Re: 3.81 and windows paths, Paul D. Smith, 2006/07/27
- Re: 3.81 and windows paths, Paul D. Smith, 2006/07/27
- Re: 3.81 and windows paths, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/07/28
- Re: 3.81 and windows paths, Christopher Faylor, 2006/07/28
- Re: 3.81 and windows paths, Michael Eager, 2006/07/28
- Re: 3.81 and windows paths, mwoehlke, 2006/07/28
- Re: 3.81 and windows paths, Paul D. Smith, 2006/07/28
- Re: 3.81 and windows paths, Christopher Faylor, 2006/07/28
- Re: 3.81 and windows paths, Paul D. Smith, 2006/07/28
- Re: 3.81 and windows paths, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/07/29
- Re: 3.81 and windows paths,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: 3.81 and windows paths, Paul D. Smith, 2006/07/28
- Re: 3.81 and windows paths, Chris Taylor, 2006/07/28
- Re: 3.81 and windows paths, John W. Eaton, 2006/07/28
- Re: 3.81 and windows paths, John W. Eaton, 2006/07/28
- Re: 3.81 and windows paths, Paul D. Smith, 2006/07/28
Re: 3.81 and windows paths, Jon Grant, 2006/07/27