[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
should includes for make -n to actually make?
From: |
Marty Leisner |
Subject: |
should includes for make -n to actually make? |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jan 2002 16:55:44 -0500 |
I'm running make 3.79.1 on linux...
I normally do make -n to see what happens
The makefile had:
Makefile.dep:
$(CXX) $(CXXFLAGS) -MM *.cc > Makefile.dep
-include Makefile.dep
and it seems the dep rule took higher priority then -n.
I was under the impression -n would be non-destructive and merely
print stuff instead of creating files.
Is there a way to just show what would happen without executing
(even include files?)
marty address@hidden
Don't confuse education with schooling.
Milton Friedman to Yogi Berra
- should includes for make -n to actually make?,
Marty Leisner <=