[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Only one pattern-specific variable assignment per target?
From: |
Jonathan Kamens |
Subject: |
Re: Only one pattern-specific variable assignment per target? |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Nov 2001 10:32:55 -0500 |
> Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 10:24:10 -0500
> From: "Paul D. Smith" <address@hidden>
>
> This has been fixed in CVS for a while; the fix will be in the next
> release of GNU make. If you like I can send you a patch.
Has the bug with multiple pattern-specific assignments for a single
target been fixed as well? Was the patch I submitted helpful?
Do you have any idea when the next release will be? I'm not asking
for a commitment, just a ballpark estimate, if you have one.
> I acknowledge them to the best of my ability. Have reported bugs that
> weren't acknowledged?
I don't believe any of these messages were acknowledged:
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:03:49 -0500
From: Jonathan Kamens <address@hidden>
Message-Id: <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Subject: make 3.79.1: should have "--no-builtin-includes" option
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 12:38:26 -0400
From: Jonathan Kamens <address@hidden>
Message-Id: <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Subject: Only one pattern-specific variable assignment per target?
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:41:42 -0400
From: Jonathan Kamens <address@hidden>
Message-Id: <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
CC: address@hidden
In-reply-to: <address@hidden> (message
from Jonathan Kamens on Fri, 31 Aug 2001 12:38:26 -0400)
Subject: Re: Only one pattern-specific variable assignment per target?
References: <address@hidden>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 15:35:05 -0400
From: Jonathan Kamens <address@hidden>
Message-Id: <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
CC: address@hidden
In-reply-to: <address@hidden> (message
from Jonathan Kamens on Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:41:42 -0400)
Subject: Re: Only one pattern-specific variable assignment per target?
References: <address@hidden> <address@hidden>
> jk> P.P.S. Is address@hidden archived anywhere?
>
> Sure... see the bottom of each message:
I can't do that, given that I am not a subscriber.
Thanks,
jik