[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-mailutils] Mailutils 2.99.97 now(*) available in experimental
From: |
Sergey Poznyakoff |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-mailutils] Mailutils 2.99.97 now(*) available in experimental |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:23:34 +0300 |
Jordi Mallach <address@hidden> ha escrit:
> I have uploaded an initial revision of the package targetting the
> experimental suite, without libmu_ccp or libmu_nntp, as discussed.
Thanks a lot!
> It's taken a very long time as I've been working on this for a few hours
> every... month or so, so every time I came back to this I wasn't sure were
> I got stuck or what I was looking at lately.
Yeah, I understand that.
> 2) lber_ldadd.patch: (currently disabled): when using
> LDFLAGS += -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed, Mailutils fails to build due to a
> missing -llber for libmuauth.
>
> However, the build will fail soon after as interdependencies between
> libs are missing all over the place (ie, eg. libmu_compat needing
> -lmailutils, etc), making the build fail with missing mu_* symbols.
> We already discussed this months (years?) ago, but the fix was a bit
> involved in the 2.x codebase.
Sorry, I fail to remember that... Can you give some more detail, please?
> 4) sieve2scm_help_output.patch: this trivial patch helps me generate a
> manpage for this program using help2man. Part of the patch was already
> accepted and what's left is really cosmetic. All other MU programs have
> a capitalised "Usage:", and I see no reason for the lack of space
> between the arguments.
Ok, let me see...
> 5) spelling_fixes.patch: welcome to my annoying spelling fixes patch. :)
Thanks!
> Finally, a question: the Debian freeze is right uppon us, and it's time to
> decide if wheezy ships Mailutils 2.2 or 2.99.9x.
2.99.9x, definitely!
> I'm assuming you'll recommend 2.99.x as 2.2 is already too old and
> will go unmaintained RSN, but we need to have in mind that unless you
> plan a 3.0 release like in the next week, wheezy would ship a beta
> version. What's your view on this with your upstream hat?
Well, I won't manage to finish everything in a week, that's for sure. I
cannot be sure about a month, either. My current load is a bit too
much for that, even if I concentrate entirely on MU. What I can
promise, however, is that 3.0 will be ready by the end of the summer.
Regards,
Sergey
Re: [bug-mailutils] Mailutils 2.99.97 now(*) available in experimental, Jordi Mallach, 2012/06/14