[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-mailutils] autoreconf failure
From: |
Jordi Mallach |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-mailutils] autoreconf failure |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:30:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 01:32:50PM +0300, Eray Aslan wrote:
> No, it makes a lot of sense for a source based distro like gentoo. Say
> I patch configure.ac and regenerate configure. When I push those
> changes out, every mailutils using gentoo user will patch his
> configure.ac and regenerate his own configure script.
>
> Currently, mailutils uses autotools but fails to autoreconf without
> providing a convenient way to regenerate autotools scripts.
FWIW, I'm with Eray on this one. Sometimes we need to change a
Makefile.am, or a configure.ac, or whatever in the build system, and
simply doing autoreconf works for us. We even have a debhelper module that
automates it.
bootstrap is ok for git, but people wanting to modify a tarball release
(ie, say Eray and I need to modify parts of a testsuite that failed on
sparc64), we need a reliable way of regenerating the autotools stuff.
It would certainly make our lives easier.
--
Jordi Mallach PĂ©rez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
address@hidden address@hidden http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature