[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-mailutils] Re: IMAP protocol violation in 1.1
From: |
Sergey Poznyakoff |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-mailutils] Re: IMAP protocol violation in 1.1 |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Aug 2008 23:07:03 +0300 |
Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> ha escrit:
> * PREAUTH IMAP4rev1 Debugging mode
> . select foo
> . NO SELECT Couldn't open /home/jas/foo, No such file or directory
> * 0 EXISTS
> * 0 RECENT
>
> RFC 3501 doesn't forbid EXISTS/RECENT to be sent when a mailbox isn't
> selected, as far as I can tell, but it is confusing.
I don't think it could be confusing, since untagged responses may appear
in whatever place of the conversation, even while there is no command in
progress.
Regards,
Sergey
- [bug-mailutils] Re: IMAP protocol violation in 1.1, (continued)
- [bug-mailutils] Re: IMAP protocol violation in 1.1, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2008/08/15
- [bug-mailutils] Re: IMAP protocol violation in 1.1, Simon Josefsson, 2008/08/15
- [bug-mailutils] Re: IMAP protocol violation in 1.1, Simon Josefsson, 2008/08/15
- Re: [bug-mailutils] Re: IMAP protocol violation in 1.1, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2008/08/16
- [bug-mailutils] Re: IMAP protocol violation in 1.1, Simon Josefsson, 2008/08/16
- Re: [bug-mailutils] Re: IMAP protocol violation in 1.1, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2008/08/16
- [bug-mailutils] Re: IMAP protocol violation in 1.1, Simon Josefsson, 2008/08/16
- [bug-mailutils] Re: IMAP protocol violation in 1.1, Simon Josefsson, 2008/08/16
- Re: [bug-mailutils] Re: IMAP protocol violation in 1.1, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2008/08/16
- Re: [bug-mailutils] Re: IMAP protocol violation in 1.1, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2008/08/17
- Re: [bug-mailutils] Re: IMAP protocol violation in 1.1,
Sergey Poznyakoff <=
- [bug-mailutils] Re: IMAP protocol violation in 1.1, Simon Josefsson, 2008/08/18
- [bug-mailutils] Re: IMAP protocol violation in 1.1, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2008/08/18