[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-mailutils] POP3 code changes
From: |
Sergey Poznyakoff |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-mailutils] POP3 code changes |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Dec 2002 23:43:33 +0200 |
> I missed something along the way here - Why would we drop support for
> thread-safety?
Really, why would we? Another question is, it is not proven the
libmailbox is thread-safe. We do have provisions for cancellation
points, but have we tested this? I mean have anybody tried to
use libmailutils in a real multithreaded application?
Regards,
Sergey
- Re: [bug-mailutils] POP3 code changes, (continued)
- [bug-mailutils] mailutils todo, Alain Magloire, 2002/12/23
- Re: [bug-mailutils] POP3 code changes, Sam Roberts, 2002/12/25
- Re: [bug-mailutils] POP3 code changes, Jeff Bailey, 2002/12/23
- Re: [bug-mailutils] POP3 code changes, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/12/23
- Re: [bug-mailutils] POP3 code changes, Jeff Bailey, 2002/12/23
- Re: [bug-mailutils] POP3 code changes, Alain Magloire, 2002/12/23
- Message not available
- Re: [bug-mailutils] POP3 code changes, Jeff Bailey, 2002/12/23
- Re: [bug-mailutils] POP3 code changes,
Sergey Poznyakoff <=
- Re: [bug-mailutils] POP3 code changes, Alain Magloire, 2002/12/23
- Message not available
- Re: [bug-mailutils] POP3 code changes, Jeff Bailey, 2002/12/23
- Re: [bug-mailutils] POP3 code changes, Alain Magloire, 2002/12/23
- Message not available
- Re: [bug-mailutils] POP3 code changes, Jeff Bailey, 2002/12/23