Re: Fixing interlibrary deps.

[Jeff Bailey]

The source in glibc has been modified to work outside of the library
(the seem to like to do clever things).  I should resolve this
completely.  I'll bring it up on the gnulib mailing list.

On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 11:29:00PM -0400, Sam Roberts wrote:
> Most of lib looks like it came from GNU libc, or could be replaced with
> code extracted from GNU libc. Could that be done? libc is still LGPLed,
> right? getline(), at least, should be available.
> 
> To me, an LGPLed library with a configuration mechanism that is GPLed
> seems less than complete.
> 
> But, since I don't have the time to write or find code to replace the GPLed
> stuff, we may not have any choice other than to use the existing lib/ code, 
> and
> of course respect the licences the authors used.
> 
> Cheers,
> Sam
> 
> Quoteing address@hidden, on Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 02:01:25PM +0300:
> > 
> > A correction to the above: mu_argp depends on getline.c and argcv.c, both
> > of which are under GPL and cannot be included to libmailbox. We'll
> > have to move mu_argp.c back to lib/. Opinions?
> 
> -- 
> Sam Roberts <address@hidden> (Vivez sans temps mort!)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-mailutils mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-mailutils
> 

-- 
learning from failures is nice in theory...
but in practice, it sucks :)
 - Wolfgang Jaehrling