[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mailutils, and the licencing web
From: |
xystrus |
Subject: |
Re: mailutils, and the licencing web |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Apr 2002 13:12:46 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.22.1i |
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 10:48:19PM -0400, Sam Roberts wrote:
> So, my question:
>
> - can sieve, the library or the executables, be distributed with mailutils?
You know, a lot of people developing software in the free software
world complain about why a lot of other people don't re-use more code,
instead of reinventing the wheel over and over... This kind of
question is exactly why: the licensing problems are too troublesome
and confusing. In many cases, easier and better to just re-implement
your own code with the license you want to use.
Xy
- Re: --lock-flags now configurable, and some mu_argp reorg, (continued)
- Re: --lock-flags now configurable, and some mu_argp reorg, Sam Roberts, 2002/04/12
- Re: --lock-flags now configurable, and some mu_argp reorg, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/04/12
- Re: --lock-flags now configurable, and some mu_argp reorg, Alain Magloire, 2002/04/12
- mailutils, and the licencing web, Sam Roberts, 2002/04/12
- Re: mailutils, and the licencing web, Alain Magloire, 2002/04/12
- Re: mailutils, and the licencing web, Jeff Bailey, 2002/04/13
- Re: mailutils, and the licencing web, Sam Roberts, 2002/04/13
- Re: mailutils, and the licencing web,
xystrus <=
- Re: mailutils, and the licencing web, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/04/15
Re: --lock-flags now configurable, and some mu_argp reorg, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/04/11