[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C/C++ (was Re: mailbox (was Re: intro))
From: |
Nic Ferrier |
Subject: |
Re: C/C++ (was Re: mailbox (was Re: intro)) |
Date: |
13 Mar 2002 21:08:38 +0000 |
"Alain Magloire" <address@hidden> writes:
> Alright then, lets view it another way: I think we all agree
> on the need to have a clear lower level API to talk to the
> underlying mailbox formats.
> Now comes the framework, that API to talk transparently to all of them,
> in C it is cumbersome and the language gets in the way, for example
> message_set_header() or mailbox_set_xxx this, mailbox_get_xx that
> there is no real inheritance, so we have end up with a bunch
> of _set/get_ calls, it can get messy especially when something
> wrong happen, in the lowest level(This is were sometimes, I crave
> for a good C++ throw 8).
On the other hand the reason one uses C is that it is the lowest
common denonminator and a lingua franca.
That's why the GNU project encourages people to use it, in preference
to other languages.
I don't believe that mailutils will achieve widespread success if it's
a C++ library.
But that's just my view.
Nic
- Re: intro, (continued)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- mailbox (was Re: intro), xystrus, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailbox (was Re: intro), Alain Magloire, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailbox (was Re: intro), Jeff Bailey, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailbox (was Re: intro), Alain Magloire, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailbox (was Re: intro), Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailbox (was Re: intro), Alain Magloire, 2002/03/13
- Re: C/C++ (was Re: mailbox (was Re: intro)), Alain Magloire, 2002/03/13
- Re: C/C++ (was Re: mailbox (was Re: intro)),
Nic Ferrier <=
- Re: C/C++ (was Re: mailbox (was Re: intro)), xystrus, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailbox (was Re: intro), Sam Roberts, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailbox (was Re: intro), Sam Roberts, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailbox (was Re: intro), xystrus, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailbox (was Re: intro), Sam Roberts, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailbox (was Re: intro), xystrus, 2002/03/13
- Message not available
- Re: intro, xystrus, 2002/03/13
- Re: intro, Jeff Bailey, 2002/03/13
- Re: intro, xystrus, 2002/03/13
- Re: intro, Sam Roberts, 2002/03/13