[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mailutils
From: |
Jeff Bailey |
Subject: |
Re: mailutils |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Mar 2002 08:50:51 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 11:46:58AM +0200, Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
> > I do not want to scare anybody, but maybe(only maybe) we
> > should take a seriously look at some basic C++ for mailutils2
> > ... Ok I've said it ... I feel better.
> If you mean providing a C++ interface in parallel with the existing
> C, I quite agree with you. But rewriting the library in C++ will
> mean that C programs will not be able to use it anymore.
I haven't tried it, but shouldn't it be possible to write C++
functions that use C linking conventions?
--
Some people play the lottery, some people use Ebay. Personally, I've
had much better luck with Ebay than the lottery
- hendridm
- Re: mailutils, (continued)
- Re: mailutils, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailutils,
Jeff Bailey <=
- Re: mailutils, Alain Magloire, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailutils, Jeff Bailey, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailutils, Alain Magloire, 2002/03/13
- cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Richard Dawe, 2002/03/15
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Sam Roberts, 2002/03/16
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Jeff Bailey, 2002/03/20
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Sam Roberts, 2002/03/21
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Alain Magloire, 2002/03/21
- Message not available
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Sam Roberts, 2002/03/21
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Alain Magloire, 2002/03/21