[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mailutils
From: |
Sergey Poznyakoff |
Subject: |
Re: mailutils |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Mar 2002 11:46:58 +0200 |
> I do not want to scare anybody, but maybe(only maybe) we
> should take a seriously look at some basic C++ for mailutils2
> ... Ok I've said it ... I feel better.
If you mean providing a C++ interface in parallel with the existing C,
I quite agree with you. But rewriting the library in C++ will mean
that C programs will not be able to use it anymore.
Regards,
Sergey
- Re: mailutils, (continued)
- Re: mailutils,
Sergey Poznyakoff <=
- Re: mailutils, Jeff Bailey, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailutils, Alain Magloire, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailutils, Jeff Bailey, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailutils, Alain Magloire, 2002/03/13
- cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Richard Dawe, 2002/03/15
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Sam Roberts, 2002/03/16
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Jeff Bailey, 2002/03/20
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Sam Roberts, 2002/03/21
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Alain Magloire, 2002/03/21
- Message not available
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Sam Roberts, 2002/03/21