[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: imap4d_DEPENDENCIES
From: |
Sam Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: imap4d_DEPENDENCIES |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Feb 2002 09:47:05 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.0i |
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 03:32:47PM +0200, Sergey Poznyakoff <address@hidden>
wrote:
>
> I had to restore imap4d_DEPENDENCIES in imap4d/Makefile.am. It is
> needed to let make know that imap4d depends on AUTHOBJS. The
> drawback is that it prevents the imap4d_LDADD objects from being
> appended to imap4d_DEPENDENCIES, so they have to be specified
> explicitely.
> Anybody knows a better solution?
can $(imap4d_LDADD) be added to imap4d_DEPENDENCIES?
If LDADD and DEPENDENCIES really are different, I don't think its bad to
have both. I changed it because I thought the DEPENDENCIES was alwasy
the same as LDADD, minus libmailutils.a and a few other things.
Sam
--
Sam Roberts <address@hidden>
Re: doc installation on debian - special?, Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/21