Re: error numbers.... a continuing pain

[Jeff Bailey]

On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 11:56:37AM -0500, Sam Roberts wrote:

> #define MU_ERR_MAILBOX_NULL  0x10001
> #define MU_ERR_FOLDER_NULL   0x10002

> We could even break it into classes

> 0x100??  generic (we've already got EINVAL, ENOMEM, etc for lots of
>                    the generic errors, but there might be others)
> 0x101??  mailbox
> 0x102??  folder
> 0x103??  mailer

> What do you all think?

I think this is good - I haven't been paying as much attention as I
ought.  If I remember right, we had planned (2 or 3 years ago), to
have a whole series of E* errors devoted to these.

-- 
I want to go live with the guy who came up with the phrase "Free like
beer"