Re: Enhancement of mailer_t delivery API.

[Alain Magloire]

Bonsoir

> Houf. I'm getting lost in the thread...

Remind me when I'll start seriously with Hydrant
to put the feature to number threads like
Re[1]: ...
Re[2]: ...
...
Re[n]: ...

Or at least good threading capabilities.

> 
> -- I'm getting confused, I think we are wandering around saying the
>  same stuff, basically, is that your impression? --

8-), the pleasure of emails.
I will have something for you later.

> Q1: Do we need a .tickets for security?
> 
> A1: No.
> 
...
> Q2: Do we need .tickets then?
> 
> A2: Yes!
> 
...

Agreed with all of the above.

> Note: Owner and all
> 
> If a ticket is created from a ticket file, then as an implementation
> detail it must be known in it's callback what url it is supposed
> to be retrieving ticket info for. If the owner can't be crawled
> back up, then that info, the url perhaps must be passed into the
> callback.

sigh ... good point.  Something to remember for mailbox2.