[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: poor m4 hash performance
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
Re: poor m4 hash performance |
Date: |
Sun, 04 Jun 2006 16:53:34 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes:
> According to Ben Pfaff on 6/4/2006 4:15 PM:
>>
>> Is there a good reason why m4 should not use a hash table that
>> grows dynamically? It is easier to deal with software that can
>> figure out parameters on its own rather than having to be told.
>
> CVS head m4 does dynamically grow its hashtables; the problem is that
> backporting it to the 1.4 branch is not trivial, and at this point, the
> 1.4 branch is in non-invasive bug fix mode only. [...]
My mistake. I should not have jumped into the middle of the
thread without reading more of the context.
--
"In the PARTIES partition there is a small section called the BEER.
Prior to turning control over to the PARTIES partition,
the BIOS must measure the BEER area into PCR[5]."
--TCPA PC Specific Implementation Specification