Re: LMI random systems

[Alfred M. Szmidt]

   >     >     I can agree about LM-Prolog. But Tape is quite useful too I 
would say?
   >     >
   >     > Tape was in System, so I'll not even argue it.  I was just feeling 
the
   >     > waters ... I'd love a RTAPE interface when you're chaos.backend=local
   >     > though.
   >
   >     The local backend (or really, the old Chaos-for-unix code, not limited
   >     to FILE) has so many problems (e.g. memory leaks) that I wouldn't
   >     recommend using it.
   >
   > I know .. but .. it is what I use and depend on :-) You can't do full
   > respins over Chaosnet-for-UDP!!

   Why not? As long as you have your cbridge/cbFILE set up, there shouldn't 
   be any observable difference from local (except it's more reliable and 
   faster)?

I was thinking Lisp Machine to Lisp Machine.  cbridge/cbFILE and a
MINI server should work, other than reliablity, and having to run
multiple processes -- right now it is trivial.

There was an issue if you have Unix-Versions loaded...  I can try this
again now that 301 is sorta out, and we are working slightly slower
for a bit (trying to figure out which systems can be lifted in their
entierty, or if we import things one by one).