[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Beams over rests and concaveness
From: |
Gilberto Agostinho |
Subject: |
Beams over rests and concaveness |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Jan 2020 15:30:36 -0700 (MST) |
Hello bug-squad,
It seems that the beam concaveness value is ignored when beaming over rests,
in the case of a single note with a single rest. This happens with and
without stemlet. See the code and score below, the groups marked with an
asterisk should have been flat (+inf.0 concaveness):
\version "2.19.82"
{
\time 12/8
g8[ g'8]
\once \override Beam.concaveness = #+inf.0
g8[ g'8]
g8[ r8]
\once \override Beam.concaveness = #+inf.0
g8[ r8]^"*"
\override Stem.stemlet-length = #1
g8[ r8]
\once \override Beam.concaveness = #+inf.0
g8[ r8]^"*"
g8[ g'16 g''16]
\once \override Beam.concaveness = #+inf.0
g8[ g'16 g''16]
g8[ r16 g''16]
\once \override Beam.concaveness = #+inf.0
g8[ r16 g''16]
\override Stem.stemlet-length = #1
g8[ r16 g''16]
\once \override Beam.concaveness = #+inf.0
g8[ r16 g''16]
}
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/t4165/beam.png>
Originally reported here:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Beams-over-rests-and-concaveness-td227600.html
So it seems that neither concaveness nor damping affects those beams with
asterisks, but manually setting their positions is a workaround.
Many thanks,
Gilberto
--
Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Bugs-f58488.html
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Beams over rests and concaveness,
Gilberto Agostinho <=