Re: Viewing direct PS output?

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

address@hidden writes:
> Of course, I should have realized. If you changed the naming
> strategy in PKtrace, we have to make the corresponding change
> also when generating the lilypond.map file. Wasn't there a 
> reason that they used the TeX-* naming convention in textrace?

Given the amount of cluefullness of Peter Szabo, I'd doubt it.

> There's another font naming problem in the generated .ps files
> namely the CMR fonts used in text scripts, bar numbers and so on.
> First of all, I had to add also .../texmf/fonts/type1/bluesky to

(And of course, you'll send us a patch :-)

> GS_FONTPATH. Secondly, the Bluesky fonts use capital letters
> for the font names, so the .ps file should call for CMR10, 
> CMTI8 and so on. 

OK.
 
> Even when I managed to set all the paths and font names correctly, 
> the result looks grotesque since the font scaling completely wrong,
> see the attached example. Have I done something else wrong or ...?

no. See .45

--
Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden    | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/