[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#17294: Bug - nm_test_func check is confused with -flto
From: |
Martin Liška |
Subject: |
bug#17294: Bug - nm_test_func check is confused with -flto |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Jun 2014 11:15:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 |
On 05/17/2014 02:46 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
On 2014-04-18 15:01, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello,
starting with GCC 4.9.0, compiler will use just slim objects files during
LTO compilation. That means, no assembly output is put to object files. I
noticed that libtool uses nm tools to extract symbol from object file:
http://pastebin.com/RF1VubdR. Would it be possible to add -fno-lto for this
check?
I think there should be added '-fno-lto' at line 14:
(eval $ac_compile -fno-lto) 2>&5
What do you think about that?
Hi, and sorry for the late response.
I think that it is not possible to blindly add -fno-lto without knowing
if the compiler understands -fno-lto.
Hello Peter,
I would appreciate any kind of help connected to configure script to be
able to support -flto.
My suggestion:
1) we can detect if a compiler supports -flto
2) if so, we can define $ac_compile_without_lto = "$ac_compile -fno-lto"
3) otherwise, $ac_compile_without_lto = $ac_compile
What do you think about it?
Today, I found out another packages suffering from the same problem.
Thanks,
Martin
Changing this takes more effort, sorry.
Cheers,
Peter
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#17294: Bug - nm_test_func check is confused with -flto,
Martin Liška <=