[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin]
From: |
Charles Wilson |
Subject: |
Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin] |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Jun 2010 08:08:19 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 |
On 6/15/2010 1:04 AM, Charles Wilson wrote:
> On 6/14/2010 11:26 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> Can you try whether this fixes the issue?
>
> It does, but I only tried to run test 048. I'll report back tomorrow
> after the whole test suite finishes. Then I'll try incrementally to
> address your points vis the other two failures (069 and 092).
Yep, everything's fine. New test suite results: failed 70 and 93
70: dlloader API FAILED (dlloader-api.at:422)
93: C++ exception handling FAILED (exceptions.at:265)
which is expected (given that the new test suite added a new test,
bumping old 69 to new 70, etc). I'll take a look at 93 next.
--
Chuck
- [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Charles Wilson, 2010/06/11
- Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Charles Wilson, 2010/06/15
- Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/16
- Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Charles Wilson, 2010/06/16
- Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Charles Wilson, 2010/06/19
- Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/19
- Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Charles Wilson, 2010/06/19
- Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/06/16
Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Charles Wilson, 2010/06/17