Re: F13 SELinux failure

[Peter O'Gorman]

On 06/07/2010 02:32 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> On 06/07/2010 02:16 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> > What's the nature of the failure? In general, we care about letting our
> > testsuite skip for cases it cannot reasonably pass, but only in those
> > cases. Can we detect it reliably?
>
> It says this:
>
> demo-exec.test: === Running demo-exec.test
> demo-exec.test: === Executing uninstalled programs in libtool-2.2.8
> Welcome to GNU Hell!
> /home/pogma/tmp/libtool-2.2.8/tests/demo/.libs/lt-hell: error while
> loading shared libraries:
> /home/pogma/tmp/libtool-2.2.8/tests/demo/.libs/libhello.so.2: cannot
> restore segment prot after reloc: Permission denied

> We can check if selinux is in enforcing mode if getenforce(8) says
> "Enforcing".

Ok spent 5 minutes with google and the selinux manpages (something I 
have to do any time I do anything related to selinux).

The above is, of course, after tests/demo-nopic.test, and the problem is 
the selinux boolean allow_execmod which disallows text relocations.

I'll look into making the test skip in this case.

Peter