Re: lt_dlopenadvise() inconsistencies in libtool-2.2.2

[Bob Friesenhahn]

On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:

> I agree that this was arguably not the best decision, and maybe once 
> we've branched the tree for 2.2 maintenance we should consider 
> putting the struct in a public header along with a warning that it 
> should not be accessed to give the compiler the best chance to catch 
> these kinds of errors in future.
It is possible to "forward declare" a C structure without providing 
info about its content.  Not as nice as C++ but still good enough for 
the C compiler to issue useful diagnostics.
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/