[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
portability of -L<relative_directory_name>
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
portability of -L<relative_directory_name> |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:51:08 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Hi,
A while ago someone said that if in a build directory I have a (not yet
installed) ../lib/libfoo.la, to link with this library I should *not* use
libtool ... -L../lib -lfoo
but rather mention the .la file explicitly:
libtool ... -L../lib ../lib/libfoo.la
or
libtool ... ../lib/libfoo.la
Now I see the same advice in the second-to-last paragraph of
http://wiki.finkproject.org/index.php/Fink:Porting_Notes
Is it true that references to non-yet-installed libool libraries should not be
made with -l? If so, it would be worth to document this in the libtool
documentation. I didn't find it there.
Bruno
- portability of -L<relative_directory_name>,
Bruno Haible <=