Re: build check in AIX 5.2 / 5.3 / 6.1 - gcc/g++

[Ralf Wildenhues]

Hello Rainer,

* Rainer Tammer wrote on Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 09:39:01AM CET:
>>> If you like me to perforce some tests with gcc then I can try that too..
>>
>> Yes, that would be great.  The systems I test on currently don't have
>> g++ or gfortran (or gcj) installed, so if you could test
>>   ./configure CC=gcc CXX=g++ FC=gfortran F77=gfortran
>>   
> branch-1.5
> =======
>
> The make check does show some errors...

Indeed:

> /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CXX   --mode=link g++  -g -O2  -Wl,-brtl -o tagdemo 
> main.o libbaz.la
> g++ -g -O2 -Wl,-brtl -o tagdemo main.o  ./.libs/libbaz.a
> ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .std::basic_ostream<char, 
> std::char_traits<char> >& std::operator<< <std::char_traits<char> 
> >(std::basic_ostream<char, std::char_traits<char> >&, char const*)
> ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .std::basic_ostream<char, 
> std::char_traits<char> >& std::endl<char, std::char_traits<char> 
> >(std::basic_ostream<char, std::char_traits<char> >&)
> ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: vtable for 
> __cxxabiv1::__si_class_type_info
> ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: vtable for __cxxabiv1::__class_type_info
> ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .std::basic_ostream<char, 
> std::char_traits<char> >::operator<<(double)
> ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .std::basic_ostream<char, 
> std::char_traits<char> >::operator<<(unsigned long)
> ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .std::basic_ostream<char, 
> std::char_traits<char> >::operator<<(long)
> ld: 0711-345 Use the -bloadmap or -bnoquiet option to obtain more information.
> collect2: ld returned 8 exit status
> gmake[3]: *** [tagdemo] Error 1

Can you try these and show output?
  cd tagdemo
  /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -v -g -O2 -Wl,-brtl -o tagdemo 
main.o libbaz.la
  /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -v -g -O2 -Wl,-brtl -o tagdemo 
main.o libbaz.la -lstdc++ -lm

Please also show
  ./libtool --tag=CXX --config | grep -E '^(pre|post)dep'

Somehow it seems '-lstdc++ -lm' does not find its way into CXX postdeps.

Thanks,
Ralf