[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gmake .... seems to be moved...
From: |
Maurizio Caloro |
Subject: |
Re: gmake .... seems to be moved... |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Sep 2006 07:19:55 +0200 |
Thanks a bomb! for your help !!!
i have learn with you to analyse error on a other way
gtk run now without question to end
and this "seems to be move" are now story.....!!!
greetings
Maurizio
Forwarded by Maurizio Caloro <address@hidden>
----------------------- Original Message -----------------------
From: Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden>
To: Caloro Maurizio <address@hidden>
Cc: address@hidden
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 16:06:43 +0200
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: gmake .... seems to be moved...
----
The culprit is /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.la. It contains references to
/usr/local:
dependency_libs=' -L/usr/local/lib /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.la
/usr/local/lib/libgmodule-2.0.la /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.la
/usr/local/lib/libintl.la /usr/local/lib/libiconv.la -lc'
If you know that all of the libraries libatk was linked against are
installed in /usr/lib (or binary compatible ones), then you may edit
the file /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.la and fix these references.
Cheers,
Ralf