[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: You should add the contents of `m4/argz.m4' to `aclocal.m4' messages
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: You should add the contents of `m4/argz.m4' to `aclocal.m4' messages |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Mar 2006 00:43:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
Hi Alexandre,
Sorry for the delay.
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 12:42:31PM CET:
>
> libtoolize: You should add the contents of `m4/argz.m4' to `aclocal.m4'.
> libtoolize: You should add the contents of `m4/lt~obsolete.m4' to
> `aclocal.m4'.
>
> IMHO, these messages are confusing for three reasons:
> 1. They magically appeared during the second run.
> 2. These files contains macros that are not used _this_ configure, so need
> not be added to aclocal.m4.
> 3. In this case aclocal.m4 is generated by aclocal, so the user should never
> be asked to touch this file.
Agreed on all counts.
> Is there a way to get rid of these messages in order not to
> confuse people?
Yes, we should fix that before the release. I'm not even sure whether
we even have a pending patch for this.
> For instance maybe libtoolize could guess that
> aclocal is being used, checking the presence of ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS
> or looking into aclocal.m4?
Would be an idea, too. Patch welcome in any case. ;-)
I hope to be done with my round of Autoconf testing very soon; I plan to
then start working on Libtool backlog, piling high :-(
Cheers,
Ralf