Re: [PATCH] Standalone libltdl Build

[Noah Misch]

Gary,

On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 09:28:51AM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:

> Hmmm... I don't want to go back down this road if I can avoid it, 
> because by not using libltdl configure.ac (and this will be especially
> true when we've moved to an Autotest testsuite) we save shipping another
> aclocal.m4, configure, ltmain.sh etc.

I had not considered that.

> I think the right way to catch a regression like this is by adding a new 
> test that builds a standalone libltdl with the user's autotools.  The 
> test coverage of libltdl is particularly poor right now, so I would hope
> that such a test might open the door for better libltdl test cases all
> round.

That does sound superior.

> I'll commit a more conservative fix to branch-2-0 and HEAD soon.

Thanks.  I appreciate the review.