[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: {SPAM 03.3} Re: Support for the Intel C++ compiler is broken
From: |
Gary V . Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: {SPAM 03.3} Re: Support for the Intel C++ compiler is broken |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Apr 2004 14:05:50 +0100 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Roberto!
$ autoreconf -i
aclocal: configure.ac: 31: macro `AM_PROG_LIBTOOL' not found in library
autoreconf: aclocal failed with exit status: 1
This indicates that your autoconf is not new enough. CVS libtool is
moving
away from AC_ and AM_ macros and trying to stay in the LT_ namespace.
I don't recall whether the latest autoconf release understands LT_INIT
(the
replacement for AC_PROG_LIBTOOL), so you may also need a CVS autoconf.
If you intend to convert your own configure.ac files to use CVS libtool,
you will need to run autoupdate from a recent autoconf after you have
installed
libtool's latest macros. Or you can do it by hand if you look at the
demo
directories for examples...
And, moreover, I don't know which configure.ac the message
is talking about. Here is line 31 of the configure.ac
in the ccdemo directory:
You can see `Entering foo directory' and `Leaving foo directory'
messages
in the output... so it would still be in the directory most recently
entered.
HTH,
Gary.
- --
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFAimY2FRMICSmD1gYRAlANAKCgI9E+aUGq+sakE1vr7WRKjUWDEACfTop6
qXOawmbGM/ovLbFmFiCPwXw=
=GlG5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Support for the Intel C++ compiler is broken, Roberto Bagnara, 2004/04/16
- Re: {SPAM 03.3} Support for the Intel C++ compiler is broken, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/04/16
- Re: {SPAM 03.3} Support for the Intel C++ compiler is broken, Roberto Bagnara, 2004/04/17
- Re: {SPAM 03.3} Re: {SPAM 03.3} Support for the Intel C++ compiler is broken, Gary V . Vaughan, 2004/04/19
- Re: Support for the Intel C++ compiler is broken, Roberto Bagnara, 2004/04/20
- Re: {SPAM 03.3} Re: Support for the Intel C++ compiler is broken, Gary V . Vaughan, 2004/04/20
- Re: Support for the Intel C++ compiler is broken, Roberto Bagnara, 2004/04/21
- Re: Support for the Intel C++ compiler is broken, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/04/23
- Re: Support for the Intel C++ compiler is broken, Roberto Bagnara, 2004/04/24
- Re: {SPAM 03.3} Re: Support for the Intel C++ compiler is broken,
Gary V . Vaughan <=
Re: Support for the Intel C++ compiler is broken, Roberto Bagnara, 2004/04/19