Re: BUG: library type search order

[Gary V . Vaughan]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Scott!

On 24 Mar 2004, at 14:01, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 11:38, Gary V.Vaughan wrote:
>
> > On 24 Mar 2004, at 02:08, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > I've also decided that the lack of an rpath is actually right for
> > > non-libtool libraries, we should only hardcode paths of libtool
> > > libraries because we have more control over those.
> >
> > Hmmm... I'm not so sure.
> >
> > Read this thread and see if you change your mind :-)
> >
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/1999/debian-devel-199902/
> > msg00033.html
> Oh, I agree with RPATHing in general; I'm just not sure that we have 
> all
> the information when linking to a non-Libtool library:
>
>         $ libtool --mode=link gcc -o test test.lo \
>                 -L/somewhere/lib -lfoo

I see what you mean now.  Agreed.

Cheers,
        Gary.
- --
Gary V. Vaughan      ())_.  address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist   ( '/   http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker           / )=   http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author   `(_~)_   http://sources.redhat.com/autobook

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFAZWgeFRMICSmD1gYRAtxbAKCDZRuREkN4pTrMjgPKTcdIHnl8IQCfcog4
vHaJoygNa/oISaj0DNHDWj0=
=WSI0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----